01 December 2008

********************************************************************************
Most people divide music roughly into two groups: there is present-day music that is popular and which one listens to for fun (or with some nostalgia) and there are the classics or jazz musicians for the few with supposedly developed aesthetic taste. This division renders the aesthetically minded utterly disconnected from the time they live in. At the same, the contemporary minded only get bad copies of the past, unexpressive of the times we live in, while downloading destroys the elitism of avant garde art by making everything available. In order not to make the present a footnote to the past and to destroy the feeling of 'everything great lies in the past' (or 'has been done already'), I want to bring some attention to contemporary electronic artists of high aesthetic quality, i.e. the musical art of our days.
********************************************************************************

Please listen to the two songs below, 'Mt. Saint Michel' and 'Vordhosbn', made by Aphex Twins (also AFX).

Almost all electronic music works with loops, repeated sequences. The only way to appreciate electronic music is to learn to appreciate repetition and simplicity. Coming from jazz or classical music, where so much happens in the music, the electronic stuff often appears simply boring or empty. In this sense, I believe that the step from classical music to Aphex Twins is less difficult, because it is so extremely complex.

The repetition of electronic music is stark, it is precise repetition, perfect mirrorage. But from the different juxtapositions of these empty formulas, there emerges complexity and expression, if one so wants. One could compare the loops with empty scientific formulas which, when used in composition allow one to express reality or even create a reality (i.e. a model).

Mt Saint Michel + St Michael Mount


The world created by Mt. Sain Michel in my head, starts from the memory, the memory of religion and faith, of the calling church bells, the sound of the social community; yet also a sound ordering one to sit down and pray, the sounds of chains. This memorial sound is crushed by the aggresive beat, it is consumed by the overwhelming sway of the artifical. Soon the mechanic beats slowly silences, growing empty and leaving an empty wasteland. From this open space the melody arises, struggling to free itself from the repetition that captures it. It is the human voice, insecure with its new freedom, devasted with the emptiness that the destruction has brought about, clinging to the clockworks. Until it gives up and accepts the mechanic as given, accepting technology as its king. When we almost forgot about humanity, about the unpredictable, a voice arises, slowly fusing with the mechanical. Has the technology became human, or our humanity become technological? And what does it turn into? Is the sound a reflection of the church bells or is it the fragmentary that strives for continuity? What are you, anyways an emoticon or a product of the past?

Vordhosbn


What happens when the melody becomes beat and the beat becomes melody? In Vordhosbn I a constant interplay, an oscillation between the beat expressing melody and melody expressing the beat. There is the constant interplay between the fragmentary ideas, the bits that are supposed to express the reality around you, and the fullness of the world around; there is the everlasting tension between being determined by the world around you and you imposing carved up bits to carve up the world that surrounds you.


Although I have not done justice to the darker tensions of the music above, the rest will be more easy listening, more popular but great ways to get used to his sound and be ready for his more quirky stuff. Indeed it does take time to really appreciate the above, but isn't it exactly the same as with Mozart and the likes?


Windowlicker


Didgeridoo


Xtal [Turn Volume up]


Monkey Drummer [The Great Videoclip of Cunningham]

1 Comment:

  1. Sokol said...
    Hey man,

    It's the first time I come across a genuine personal explanation of what electronic music "does" to the mind of the modern man. And which I relate with.
    We're inevitably modern and that makes me a seriously react to electronic music. (Nothing in the level of preference or choice, though.)It is true that electronic music does clash with all essentialist ideas that one wants to cling to. Not only wants to, but he cannot forget the essential grounding, the rootedness of his existence. But immersion in electronic tunes is by virtue of their dissonance a distraction of this rootedness. Likewise, by virtue of living in a fragmentary modernity (this term is already a post-modern cliche)one cannot engage properly with essentialities if not grinding himself in these sounds which, as you say, are memory of faith, of church bells, social community,of chains. They tell you to move and forget and sit and remember at the same time.

    cheers,
    Sokol

Post a Comment